EVERY EMPIRE THAT COLLAPSED HAD LGBTQ GAYNESS AS A THIRD SEX..ROMANS , GREEKS, PERSIANS ETC..a civil partner contract is needed for them

EVERY EMPIRE THAT COLLAPSED HAD LGBTQ GAYNESS AS A THIRD SEX..ROMANS , GREEKS, PERSIANS ETC...AND NOW THE WESTERN WORLD..LEGALISED GAY MARRIAGE WHICH IS AN OXYMOR0N.THERE SHOULD BE A CIVIL PARTNER CONTRACT......NO DISCRIMINATION. IT IS NOT BEING GAY THAT IS THE PROBLEM IT IS THE PRACTICING OF IT AND INSTITUTIONALISING IT INTO A THIRD SEX LIKE PLATO'S 'SYMPOSIUM'' PERSONALLY I DON'T CARE WHAT PEOPLE DO AS LONG AS THEY DON'T SCARE THE HORSES....BUT MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN AND LGBTQ SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN 'EXTRA' RIGHTS...OR A THIRD SEX. IT SHOULD BE NOTICED ONE OF THE REASONS FOR ADAM AND EVE WAS TO OVERCOME CONFUSED SEXUALITY AND TO INSTITUTE THE FAMILY OF ONE MAN ONE WOMAN, AS UP TO THEN PEOPLE LIVED IN GROUPS AS IN FACT MUSLIMS PARTIALLY CAN TODAY...STILL.THIS WAS OPPOSED BY THE ENEMIES OF ADAM THE SONS OF BELIAL WHO ARE EASILY IDENTIFIED WITH SEXUAL DEVIANCY AND INSTITUTIONALISED HOMOSEXUALITY...CHECK GENEIS...I MADE THEM MAN AND WOMAN----NOT A THIRD SEX.. HindU LAW 0F MANU SAYS - SEX WITH A MALE UPON MALE IS UNNATURAL.... The only real pronouncement Jesus made on human sexuality concerns the union of male and female as the expression of the order created by God (with an explicit quotation from Genesis 1:27 and 2:24) in a discussion on marriage: "Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female ... and the two shall become one?" (Mt 19:4-5; Mk 10:6-7). Paul’s references to homosexual acts were not particularly controversial to early Christians who knew that the holiness code of Leviticus forbad homosexual acts (Leviticus 20:13). Paul was merely reaffirming that which was held by faithful Jews and early Christians. We have no evidence that there was a movement afoot in Corinth to press for wider acceptance of same-sex activity. Paul does not single out homosexuality but refers to it within a list of other acts that were accepted as idolatrous but were now to be left behind by those who had chosen Jesus. So, although is not homophobic, he is clearly against any form of homosexual activity. Based on Scripture, the Catholic Church teaches that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to natural law.” (CCC 2357) At the same time, the Church teaches that people with homosexual tendencies “must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity” and that any sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.” (CCC 2357) http://blogs.christianpost.com/confident-christian/does-paul-condemn-homosexuality-in-1-corinthians-and-1-timothy-12362/ TONY O'CLERY....FEB 5 2017.