One of my first realisations when i first started meditation was this; I asked myself allowed where is the soul of the ape if the ego descends into the body.....???? or foetus rather....And the answer was it is still there !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When the ego dies at realisaton the body still lives on............... Tony O'Clery WE ARE POSSESSED PEOPLE WAKE UP!!! Tony O'Clery The ego will try to kill you to escape alive if you are close to realisation sometimes like MATHRU SRI SARADA. Tony O'Clery The ego is crafty hides and convinces people that really it is them thinking...not it. about an hour ago · Orli . Hey Tony ...so you are saying that we are actually playing with fire if we get to close to realization, because our own ego will try to kill us..... Tony O'Clery Yes in a way but if one has done the meditation and sadhana this should be controlled,,,read ; I am that' by david godman. Tony O'Clery It is not our own ego that is the problem..... 40 minutes ago · Like Tony O'Clery Saradamma's ego tried to kill her so it could escape and survive and to go into a different body..of any kind. Tony O'Clery Problem is the ego ends up thinking that the body is its body... Tony O'Clery When the ego is dead the purified vijnanamayakosa takes over the running of the body mind complex................... Most people do not realise that they are possessed by an astral entity and all have been since they were about 4 or 5 months in the womb.......So they go through live wanting to experience pleasure with this and that and create attachments and vasanas and tendencies...........all the ego working within...... THEY ARE MOST SURPRISED WHEN THEY PAY ATTENTION TO THE EGO...AND IT CHANGES THEIR ATTITUDE FOREVER... Rememeber in Muktas after realisation there is no ego but the body is still functioning. Cat--- Peniel puts the ego thing a different way. Ego gives up serving its selfish self and serves the Inner Being instead. Not that it dies. He also mentions someone with a big ego can be a better servant once that change is made. Tony O'Clery that is wrong.. end Tony O'Clery It is a possessor or an entity as cayce calls it..........peniel is way off on that one sorry. Tony O'Clery The ego will try to kill you to escape alive if you are close to realisation sometimes like MATHRU SRI SARADA..

Misogynism is aberrant and only for the crude, dumb and ignorant

Misogynism is aberrant and only for the crude, dumb and ignorant. The female is the natural order of everything the prana..the mother..........the life force.... The foetus in the womb starts out female and only turn male later.....Men who are misogynistic and control women do it out of fear and the misunderstanding that one can own another person. So men essentially fear women in many societies....that is like say because a bulldozer is more physically powerful than a computer it is superior...Ancient Societies even in the Celtic world were women were equal were much more organised and better ruled that we are to day by the male crooks and subservient lobbyists we call leaders and politicians............. Societies were the female is equal are much happier....as it is the natural order...T.. Like · · Share

Semantics is the problem and anthropomorphising...giving a word a personality or being.....God essentially means good

Semantics is the problem and anthropomorphising...giving a word a personality or being.....God essentially means good...but it has been misappropriated by religions to be a being with attributes an alpha ape in the sky a giant boon granter and baby sitter who speaks through religions.............However Divine Goodness can refer to the prana very easily if not corrupted by religion/ God=Divine Goodness=- Life-Force Prana...................MA..... SO IN RELIGION GOD IS A MISMOMER AS IT REFERS TO A SUPERSTITION . GOD - The English word God is identical with the Anglo-Saxon word for “good,” and therefore it is believed that the name God refers to the divine goodness. (See Oehler's Theol. of Old Test.; Strong's and Young's concordances.) (From New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (Originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988.) Further information on the source of our word for ‘God’ is listed below: Word origin: God - Our word god goes back via Germanic to Indo-European, in which a corresponding ancestor form meant “invoked one.” The word’s only surviving non-Germanic relative is Sanskrit hu, invoke the gods, a form which appears in the Rig Veda, most ancient of Hindu scriptures: puru-hutas, “much invoked,” epithet of the rain-and-thunder god Indra. (From READER’S DIGEST, Family Word Finder, page 351) (Originally published by The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Pleasantville New York, Montreal; Copyright (C) 1975) Now if the sources noted above are accurate, then the word that we use for the Supreme Being, God, comes from a very pagan origin. Thus the word god is used generically by many different religions to refer to their deity or “invoked one.” om